Peer Review
Harder, Faster, Deeper: A Randomised Controlled Trial of Reviewer 2
Reviewer 2 was randomised to one of two arms. Both arms rejected. We report this as a null result and, separately, as a triumph.
Featured · Vol. 65535, No. 0
We accepted this paper in March. We rejected it in March. Both decisions are final. The status of the manuscript resolves only when someone reads it — which, per our mission statement, we do not do.
Peer Review
Reviewer 2 was randomised to one of two arms. Both arms rejected. We report this as a null result and, separately, as a triumph.
Funding
Four hundred pages of justification. One paragraph of desire. We analyse the gap and find it is the entire field.
Institutional
Following each strategic plan, the institution becomes unable to respond to further stimulus for a period of three to five years. n = 1.
Correspondence
The decision arrived before the acknowledgements did. We thank the editor for their enthusiasm and their speed, in that order.